-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Brad Smith <brads@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > >>The FDP docs guide doesn't really address situations like this >>(multi-key sequences) directly, so is there an informal standard we >>should know about before settling on one or the other? > > > My rule of thumb is that printable characters are shown as simply a string. You mean without any markup at all? I'm not sure about that. After all, everything else (commands, user input, key combos) are tagged in such a way that they will be visually differentiated from the rest of the text. I think it would look inconsistent if only these instructions were treated as regular text so, for our purposes, I think we definitely need to tag it with something, I'm just unsure what. Thank you for the input, - --Brad -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDhNe5Dvp49DvQ8kcRAvJCAJ4lIo9AxuJr6HcKt6p51jxtL53OfACfUQL4 8xsUOqyJx1sCw3tM3jm4wk8= =d92L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
