On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 10:29 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 11:10 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > I would like to see this instead as a standard: > > > > > > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial"> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here --> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here --> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)"> > > > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft --> > > > > Another +1. > > > > I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may > > all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than > > specifically for printing. > > Excellent point. +1 -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
