Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > I can't find precedent for this approach, though. Can you point to > > a package set using the "foo-<lang>-*" template? > Ahh, yes. See e.g. koffice-langpack-* in Extras I think. I haven't > looked at the SRPM yet. NOT COUNTING KDE!! I'm kidding. Maybe that should be "I'm kdeing" ;-) > > About the "Documentation/<lang>" groups, I don't know. I'm intrigued > > though, so I'll look at the anaconda stuff to see what needs to be > > done. > I thought this was underway in Anaconda, but doesn't even that revolve > around comps? Dunno. I'm looking. > > I don't consider having the author team maintain one overhead file for > > RPM generation much of a burden. > Agreed there. I think it would be cool if we simply required one extra > file, an XML one based on the DTD you provided. All authors and > translators could update that, and everything needed to press the spec, > OMF, .desktop, etc. would come out of that file at build time. If you can send me the prototype OMF, et.al., I may find time to produce some XSL stylesheets to do the necessary transformation from the funky XML info file into an OMF or a SPEC and be able to eschew any additions to Fedora Extras. Cheers
Attachment:
pgp3pJNEGWMB9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
