On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 12:42 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:57 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Generating this RPM would actually explode into separate
> >> foo.en.noarch.rpm or foo.zn_CH.noarch.rpm packages depending on
> >> the ${LANGUAGES} make(1) macro. Or should all translations stay
> >> in a single package with per-locale subdirs?
> >>
> >
> > The latter. It doesn't matter if the SRPM ends up being hundreds of
> > megabytes as one shouldn't need it other than in exceptional
> > circumstances.
> >
> >
>
> The SRPM can contain all languages and be as large as it needs to be,
> but the RPMs built from it should be broken down into the different locales.
Right, I misread the question, sorry.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
