Paul W. Frields wrote: > Currently, our documents have entities like this (please pardon the MUA > mangling): > > <!ENTITY % FEDORA-ENTITIES-EN SYSTEM > "../docs-common/common/fedora-entities-en.ent"> > %FEDORA-ENTITIES-EN; > <!ENTITY BOOKID "foo-tutorial-0.15 (2005-01-01)"> <!-- change version of > manual and date here --> > > > I would like to see this instead as a standard: > > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial"> > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here --> > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here --> > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)"> > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft --> > > > Any input? > > +1 It is usually considered best practice to track a package's name, version and revision date separately. No sense in making an exception for docs. :-) -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx www.n-man.com --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
