Karsten Wade wrote: > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 00:03 -0500, David-Paul Niner wrote: > > >>Well, still no love -- just did a re-send and it bounced right back. >>Any suggestions at this point would be greatly appreciated. > > > One common problem we've seen is having the email address you are > registering with and/or sending from not having a GPG uid. I already > discarded the earlier parts of this thread, so I don't have an example > GPG key of yours to check, but here is mine for example: > > pub 1024D/AD0E0C41 2003-11-26 > Key fingerprint = 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E > 0C41 > uid Karsten G. Wade (quaid|phig) > <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > uid Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> > sub 1024g/C07806E8 2003-11-26 > > The second uid for kwade@xxxxxxxxxx was necessary before I could use > this GPG key for the CLA process. Otherwise, it got kicked back as > invalid. > > Still, though, I'd figure the account you were sending from may not > matter, since it's not a signed email being looked for but rather a > signed CLA attached to an email. Hmmm ... > > This page has our collected knowledge so far: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/UsingGpg > > I'll be in #fedora-docs on irc.freenode.net early on Friday, if you come > by you can also email me a copy of the signed CLA and I can see if I > have any problems decrypting it with your public key. > > G'luck - Karsten > When I try to do the manual search for my key on pgp.mit.edu using the instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/UsingGpg/WithEvolution The server responds immediately, and I can pick the correct key (it's #1), but it times out while trying to fetch it. Quite odd, indeed. Goodnight and thank you, DP -- David-Paul Niner, RHCE Orange Park, Florida, United States GPG Key ID: 0x106B54E3 -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
