On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:18 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 08:01 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > While I was on and in various planes and hotel rooms in Seattle I > > > > managed to cobble together a couple kibbles 'n' bits in the docs-common > > > > module that should make our documentation easier to read. > > > Today (Sat Sep 10 08:00:45 CDT 2005) I tried this. The > > > "html-nochunks" doesn't complain, but the plain "html" target is > > > broken. > > > How can I reproduce just the "warning" you mention? > > Back from vacation... have you tried this recently? I just built a doc > > without problems, other than the expected warning. > > Probably not. > > Which document are we discussing? I've built all the targets for the > "example-tutorial" and didn't notice any errors or warnings. Example-tutorial, up until last night, didn't include a <revhistory> section that would produce the warning. If you update your local copy and "make html" you should see the warning in question now. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
