> We've had a convention of not including the prompt at all. This is > different from other UNIX documentation. However, I don't think anyone > has complained. > > My guess is, the prompt was dropped for clarity sake? In RH docs, we > use <prompt> only when specifically discussing the prompt, otherwise > it's left out for visual clarity, I reckon. Hmm.. My concern about this is that since sometimes a prompt is necessary eg to differentiate between stationX and stationY in a networking example, we should always show a prompt. Otherwise it looks wierd and inconsistent to have a prompt for some commands, but not for others. Opinions? --Brad
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
