On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: > > >Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > > > > >>If there are questions that we can answer within legal constraints go > >>ahead and suggest that or better yet get yourself wiki access and show > >>us how its done better > >> > >> > > > >You mean, "get off your backside"! > > > > > Oh my. It was a invitation to participate. Yes, that is how Tim interpreted it, a call for -him- to get off his backside. IIUC. > > > >Then, what to do if Fedora installs OK in text mode > >but X is not running properly? > > > There are questions that better fit into the installation and a system > administration guide itself Right, the FAQ tries to steer people the answer, where the answer is not in scope to provide, i.e., is more than a short answer. Another item of note is that we are -not- trying to supplant the fedorafaq.org, but to supplement it. That is much more of a user-driven FAQ, at it's start. We obviously want to be real questions with real answers, so participation in making the questions real is a Good Thing. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
