On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 02:42 +0100, Stuart Ellis wrote: > > Cool. Would it be worth converting into DocBook, or is it better on the > Wiki where developers can update it ? Let's keep it on the Wiki for a while. Advertise it to the developers to tweak. When/if it settles down, we'll codify it. Meanwhile, we can include a snapshot of it in the release notes. So, for that matter, yeah, we'll need to DocBookify it for the test1 notes. Maybe make a note in a comment block in the source of the Wiki page about where the XML is kept in CVS. Wiki is canonical until we switch. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
