On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 08:08 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Karsten, > > I tried adding the yum doc to the web CVS, and was denied access. I > realized that I needed cvsfedora rights in the account system, so I > applied, but haven't yet been approved. Silly me, I had just added you manually to the ACLs. Naturally, it's more convoluted than that. :) > If you have rights to do this, > it would be great if you could. Otherwise I can bother someone else, if > you can make a suggestion... I don't have auth to administer that group. Your request to join generates an automatic message that goes to the admins, and is regen'd every 24 hours that it is not addressed. So, consider them bugged. :) > Although sponsorship is apparently > "unneeded," according to the account system, I'm sure that someone would > feel better if they knew you were vouching for said access. :-) It's probably Elliot anyway, and he knows who you are. AIUI, sponsorship is a concept built into the system. It is a "who to go to in case this guy messes stuff up," a sort of guarantee to clean-up after someone else's mistakes. It seems to be enabled so far for only cvsextras. In other words, nothing here is mission critical enough to require such a sponsorship chain. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
