On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 08:21 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:58 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > > > I always replace the repositories given in the default entries > > by local repositories (I mean in Ireland, in my case). > > I don't know if that is standard practice. > > It's not, since the default entries are to mirror lists and not single > sites. Your package requests go to a random mirror entry, meaning > there's a basic and large-scale load balancing that happens without you > having to do anything. What happens otherwise if your local repo is > down? I wonder if the idea of having repositories package their .repo and other files in an RPM is going to take hold? As long as the Core and Extras repositories do that, we can use them as an example in such a way that users understand they can do the same with a repo package from their favorite outside repository. Keeping our focus on *only* what ships in Core and Extras makes our jobs both easier and hard. The old rule that, "When the only tool you have is a hammer, suddenly every problem looks like a nail," that can happen to us. However, it is awfully nice to have a scope. This is my way of saying that I concur with Paul's assessment about discussing with outside repositories. One way to be helpful could be, if we had an FAQ with a question that would have an answer of, "Don't cross the repository streams," we can just tell people that if they are using non-Core or Extras repositories, they may have conflicts between packages in those files, yadda yadda yadda. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
