On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 12:34 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I wonder what the chances are of having the release-notes errata rolled > into a fedora-release update? Note that the fedora-maintainers list is > now tossing around the idea[1] of producing an update to allow for a > script to do a "rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY*". I don't > think we should lobby for doing this with every relnotes erratum, but > certainly with the addition of the big section on legally encumbered > material, it would be worth our while to piggyback there? We were discussing this with Elliot the other day. We have a fedora- release update in QA, aiui. We want to get a latest version in any update of fedora-release. If we can close most of the bugs, I'll ask Elliot to include a build in the next fedora-release update for FC4. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
