On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 17:08 -0400, Colin Charles wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 17:03 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 15:29 -0400, Colin Charles wrote: > > > Anyone seen this? > > > > > > http://evolutioncolt.com/fedoraguide/ > > > > Yes, but I can't figure out why [t|s]he[y] didn't work with the existing > > fedorafaq.org, whose material a lot of this site duplicates. > > Can someone from the Docs steering committee ask? Or even say "lets work > together" ? Because, like FedoraFAQ much of what is contained in this EC site is legally questionable[1]. The issue of FedoraFAQ has come up before on this list (please see archives for details), and since we can't do as complete a job due to legal encumbrance, and since some of the advice given on the site violates both the spirit and mission of the Fedora Project -- e.g. to build a complete OS from free software -- we decided not to get involved officially, IIRC. If, however, you would like to get EC together with the FedoraFAQ maintainer, then by all means, do so! Collaboration is almost always a good thing in these situations. = = = = = [1] Please, PLEASE, let's not start another "legal issues" thread. :-D If anyone has questions, I beg you in the name of all that is holy, read the archives, and then post only if you have a new and *compelling* argument. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
