On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:58 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > Currently we are all over the place. Here are some variations: > > docs/release-notes/fc4/ru/ > docs/selinux-faq-fc3/ > docs/fedora-install-guide-en/ > > I tend to like directories to sort things, but that could get crazy. > Does this have a natural stopping point (bottom level) that is sane > enough? This is as deep as we need, I think: > > docs/fc4/selinux-faq/en/ > > What I see Paul is suggesting: > > docs/fc4/selinux-faq-en/ > > Timothy Murphy said: > > > I would have put the OS split (fc2, fc3, etc) before the subject > > split, since most people will only be interested in documentation > > for a given distribution. > > That's a good point worth considering. > > Are people looking for documents: > > a) First by version, then by subject? > b) First by subject, then by version? > > I'm not sure what I _think_ is true. Personally, I tend to look by > subject, then by version. There is often not what I need in my > particular version, so I am looking for 'close enough.' Reiterating what Elliot said, I'm not sure it matters much; I'm only concerned about what makes sense for our publishing routine, and what will be of the greatest value for later automation (to whatever extent is possible). Sorry I didn't give a better example when I did the OP, but the idea of "docs/some-tutorial-en/fc4/" seems best to me, since it might enable more of the build to be pasted over from Docs CVS en masse. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
