On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 10:57 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Karsten (or others), > > Is it possible that some of the folks here could get Bugzilla > "clearance" to help resolve and reassign bugs in Bugzilla? There's a > number of bugs starting to pile up that are either (1) bugs that should > be filed against other components, (2) quick fixes that we could resolve > after fixing in CVS, or (3) blank bugs saved either by accident or > through user Lack O' Clue(tm). While it's possible that this initial > surge may die down, would you like some help clearing out some of the > chaff? Consider this an offer of same. Short answer, yes, please. One can certainly clear up the issue within the bug without having any further bugzilla access, right? I don't know how to fool with bugzilla ACLs, that's something we can discuss. I -think- that any user can at least add information to a bug, such as a patch or, better yet, a pointer to the fact that it is fixed in CVS. When fixing in CVS, I highly recommend referring to the specific bugzilla number in the CVS commit message. This ties together the two disparate pieces. I'll put this in the Doc Guide to-add list. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
