Re: Saxon?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:05:43PM -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:

> Uttered Tim Waugh <twaugh@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:
> 
> > Maybe we should be looking at xmlroff, which doesn't have a dependency
> > on *yet another* XML parser
> 
> Xmlroff just doesn't work at all yet.  Try converting the IG, for instance.
> 
> At least these saxon/fop partially function.

It's unfair to say it doesn't work at all, but it certainly isn't
something that will work for everything right now, that's true.

But I do really question the benefit of switching xmlto to using
Saxon.  We should be concentrating effort on the XSL-FO -> PDF step,
not the XML -> XSL-FO step which already works perfectly well.

Tim.
*/

Attachment: pgpLqPZOltGVh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux