On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 23:00 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > On Tue 10 May 2005 12:47, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > I do not see the word "document" in the title. Aside from that, your > > argument is specious. This is open source software we are using, the > > ultimate documentation is _always_ the source code. Your inability to > > understand it does not make it any less valid. Sorry if that is harsh, > > but it's a common truth. > > It's not particularly harsh, just silly. > If someone googles for "Fedora tutorial" or whatever, > and is directed to an unreadable article, > with no instructions as to how to make it readable, > they will conclude that Fedora is for pointy-heads. When you come up with the secret formula for controlling what Google returns, let us know. Otherwise, we can't be responsible for Google finding an informal, alpha document for a version of Fedora Core we no longer document. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
