On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 10:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 10:04 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:45 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > Karsten: Assign task of making docs use common files in ./ instead of > > > ../, in order to work for separate modules per document. > > > > I can see the benefits of going both paths (centralized vs decentralized > > configs). Is there a lot of demand for local xsl customization in the > > fedora-docs/* documents? > > Actually, I don't think there would be that much demand, because it > would be a hindrance to consistency. Karsten, there should be a pretty > easy way to get modules to automatically "include" a checkout of the > common stuff. In the CVSROOT/modules file, simply insert this near the > top of the list. (The list itself is a little hinky, and could probably > use some trimming, since it has a bunch of entries that don't match > existing stuff in the repository.) > > base common css scripts xsl > > Then, for any directories containing docs (i.e. modules), do: > > module module &base > Whoops, that should have been: module module base Using the "&" ampersand symbol moves the common/, xsl/, etc. *under* the checked-out module, meaning that everyone would have to change existing Makefiles, DTD's, etc. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
