On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 18:54 -0500, Thomas Jones wrote: > I didn't mean to convey that I would just 'drop the series'. I just > don't want to step on any toes given my short time writing for the > Fedora project. You're doing great, thanks. This morning (err ... yesterday morning by the time I am sending this), I was contemplating asking you to do a technical edit of tuxxer's Hardening Guide: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2005-April/msg00299.html I'm outclassed in this particular area, somewhat. It would also give you a chance to become familiar with the other security doc in the works. It doesn't seem to me that your idea and this guide are mutually exclusive. As far as your idea in general, it sounds like a very good one. I've envisioned sets of Fedora docs tied together by common theme. It would be an awesome service to the community to have proper Fedora security guidelines and practices. It also sounds as if your ideas are generic enough to be easier to maintain across versions of Fedora Core. In other words, the ideas are timeless, and the documents don't necessarily contain procedures or formulas that need updating. That sort of work would happen in docs such as the Hardening Guide, SELinux Apache tutorial, etc. Have I interpreted this correctly? > Actually, I am fine with sole authorship. I just wanted to provide the > idea and bounce it around for comments. > > If no objections, i'll start working up a document structure tomorrow. > > Thanks again and I look forward to working with you. Sounds good, looking forward over here as well. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list