On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 19:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 16:30 -0700, tuxxer wrote: > > I was checking out the list of "ideas without owners" to see if there > > was anything that I could pick up. I didn't see anything without an > > owner in the attachment Tammy put in there many moons ago. Are the > > subjects listed there actively being worked on by the people to whom > > they've been assigned? Or have they been abandoned? > > I don't see anything active in the list there. But I have two documents > -- bugs #129738 and #129739 -- that I simply don't have time to edit. > Both need significant editorial work and technical assurance to get them > ready for publication. Care to try your hand? Sure, I can give it a shot. I haven't edited anything, before, so this will be interesting. ;-) > > And maybe this brings up an interesting question -- we may need a > tracker bug for editorial. Then we'll have: > > * Tracker for ideas without writers/owners > * Tracker for documents without editors assigned > * Tracker for documents in progress > > Does anyone have any objections? I'll wait a suitable period before > entering bugs accordingly. > Sounds like a good idea. There doesn't seem to be any real designation between authors and editors. That's kind of why I went to bugzilla and this list with the hardening overview. I think this might be a "quick pick" kind of thing, where if someone didn't have time or any idea for authoring, they could grab something waiting for editing. -Charlie -- -tuxxer echo "uvyyfsAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1) - 1)/ge' gpg: 57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340 EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
