On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 08:30 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:34 +0100, Stuart Ellis wrote: > > - Do people think it's useful/feasible to specify which versions of > > Fedora a document pertains to within the document, or not ? > > Absolutely! I have used a local entity like &FCLOCALVER; to "fix" the > pertinent information. This scheme works even for documents that we > will continue to maintain. OK. Perhaps we can formalise that as &FCTARGETVER; or similar ? > > - What should happen when the version of Fedora Core is no longer > > supported by Legacy ? At some point copies of a document will be still > > in circulation with no support at all. > > We'd have to decide whether to keep an "obsolete docs" page around, or > to simply hit 'em with the Official FDP/Acme Death Ray. I like the > former idea. I think all documents should include a statement that the > newest official version of a document can be found at the FDP web site. > There could be a statement on the FDP web site to the effect that if you > don't see your document there, check the "obsolete" page for more > information. I've now filed an RFE for this as bug 155179, with a link to your post. -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
