On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:21, Stuart Ellis wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:10 +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 00:21, Stuart Ellis wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 13:41 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > As I work with the Wiki on the monolithic release notes, I can say > > > > unequivocally that it is a pain. > > > > > > > > Perhaps if we had each section with it's own page. But then > > > > integration into a single file for /usr/share/doc/fedora-release/ is > > > > more of a challenge. > > > > > > My experience with them is that you pretty much have to submit and do > > > things the way the CMS software wants you to, or give up and find > > > another system (or just go mad). MoinMoin assumes heavily linked > > > meshes of small blocks of content... > > > > Wich is not a problem, you can use [[Include(subpage)]] to get single > > page output. > > I see what you mean: > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraDocs_2fReleaseNotes_2fCore4Test1?ac >tion=raw > > Neat. thanks Reasonable PageNames are key to this. > > > I could also write a > > MoinMoin to DocBook (or HTML) conversion. > > MoinMoin > simple DocBook export would probably be a useful thing for > lots of people, not just this project, if you were interested in doing > it. MoinMoin is on the way to produce xml AFAIK, but that's not in time for FC4. > On the Fedora Wiki specifically I think that being able to pick up > material from, say, the Extras pages, as DocBook for feeding into other > documents would be useful even if we don't explicitly use the Wiki for > drafting. It would be really helpful to have a recent MoinMoin installation on fedoraproject.org, this would reduce some work needed (it produces [almost] valid html) and is IMHO much more easy to use. (see Linuxwiki.org for example) Who maintains fedoraproject.org? -- http://LinuxWiki.org/RonnyBuchmann
