On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 17:13, Karsten Wade wrote: > We've been trying to pull together the components to make the release > notes an effort of the Fedora community. This means developers > collaborating with writers. > > This will not mean what it has in the past, with developers throwing > some bits over the wall for release notes and sometimes reading and > commenting on the drafts. When Fedora had someone paid to write > relnotes, this worked. If we can't make this work as a community effort > with resources from writers _and_ developers, we may not have any > release notes. > > The first pass at an idea is on this page, scroll down to Release Notes > Process - Iteration One, April 2005: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraDocs/fRelNotes/RelNotesProcess > > The basic idea is to break the relnotes down into modules for individual > or teams of writers to tackle. Then you would have one or more writers > dedicated to a project or subset of Linux, such as kernel, network > services, printing, UI/desktop, SELinux, etc. Then it is easier to keep > the dedicated writing resource informed throughout the development > process. > > Hopefully this makes it possible for a volunteer writer to actually have > a chance to write an accurate relnotes piece in time for test or > release. > > I'd like to keep this part of the discussion f-devel-l, but have Cc:'d > f-docs-l so everyone is aware it. Reply-to is set to keep the > discussion on f-devel-list. > > We're also debating the merits of single source in Wiki or DocBook/XML. > Advantages of the former are the ease of collaboration and getting new > writers able to contribute sooner. The advantages of XML are too > numerous to mention, but it does suffer from a longer learning curve. > If you have any comments on that, the tool choice discussion is > happening on f-docs-l. Regardless, we'll make sure the release notes > are in the proper format on the file system for Anaconda to use. What format would be good for inexperienced users to submit patches/docs in, that could be parsed by either Perl or Python, which then pumps out Docbook XML? Either via command line or a cgi/mod_perl/mod_python page? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E ghenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/
Attachment:
pgpWLhBoJJXCP.pgp
Description: PGP signature