On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 08:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > * Karsten, > > What Rahul suggests is indeed how many people have solicited peer input, > by using fedora-docs-list. Charles' hardening guide comes to mind as > well. Do you think this process merits inclusion in the Quick Start > Guide? I suppose it's possible someone could show up with a document > that requires no peer review on this list, but how often will that > happen? (And who in this environment is ever opposed to peer review, > anyway?) Yes, we discussed this idea briefly on the list, but it never made it into the QSG. Bugzilla'd now, I hope to squash all my bugs over the next few days: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153287 - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
