On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 19:37 +0100, Stuart Ellis wrote: > On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:12 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Stuart Ellis" <s.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > HTML: > > > > > > http://www.se.clara.net/fedora/software-management-en/index.html > > > > Dunno if it has been mentioned before, but could all those "su -c > > foo" lines be replaced by "sudo foo"? We should encourage the use of > > sudo(1) because it generates an audit trail, while "su -c" is untraceable. > > It's really a workaround for the fact that sudo isn't configured by > default. I didn't think that I could safely use sudo in the example > commands, since even if the Hardening Guide was up and could be linked > to, there's no guarantee that the user/admin would have successfully > gone through the setup beforehand. I like the idea of using sudo as well, but Stuart's obviously right in the more global sense of not making assumptions when you're writing a doc. But... do I sense the need for a sudo-tutorial? :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
