On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:08:24 -0800 (PST), "Rahul Sundaram" <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > ok. how about you doing the branch now and adding a > todo for it adding notes on whats expected to change. > I am actively following the fedora development tree > (running rawhide) and lists (discussions on fedora > extras, xen and what not) so I might be able to cover > up the intial stuff necessary for getting a fc4 guide > ready for the release. The best thing to do is look at the TODO list in the tarball, which is essentially the roadmap (as I see it). A branch is feasible at 0.9 (test release to fedora-list). The easy way to see what "0.9" means is to grep through the Installation Guide FIXMEs and ignore the appendices, because we can drop them and still have a useful document. You will see: - 2 sections to be written (Paul Frields has offered to tackle "Disk Partitioning"). - About three TECHQUERYs in the main text (Mayank is looking at these). - Screenshots (see separate discussions, I've made the masters and am unsure how to handle the EPS). When these are resolved one way or another we can ship 0.9 to the fedora-list. At that point we have a publically available document and can start making noise at about it. I intend to ask for people to come in and help with 64-bit and PPC right from the initial post. With a visible document the FDP could also make a case for developers to become involved in technical review for 1.0. -- Stuart Ellis s.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx