Re: Installation types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 12:25, Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 09:25, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> > > Stuart, I'm not sure what the future of that particular issue is, but I
> > > remember a time in the Red Hat Linux days when the partition layout
> > > *did* change depending on the installation type, and I assume it could
> > > conceivably be that way in the future. This may be a subject you should
> > > direct to the anaconda-devel list, to get input from the developers
> > > themselves. Does anyone else have a suggestion?
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Paul W. Frields, RHCE
> > > 
> > 
> > I remember this as well, which is why I'm a bit puzzled.  On the other
> > hand I didn't use RH8 or RH9 at all, and it's possible that I've just
> > missed something that changed along the way.  So I thought I'd post here
> > first in case it was a documented change or well-known issue.
> > --
> > Stuart Ellis
> s.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Yes. That used to be the case in RHL. Let me ask around and see if I can
> find out what it is supposed to do now. I'll get back to you.
> 
> Tammy

I just confirmed with Jeremy Katz that the partitions created are the
same for all installation types. So, we can remove that phrase from the
IG.

Tammy


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux