On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:45, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered Christian Huegel <christian.huegel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > The line: > > > <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref > > > linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref> > > > > Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the > > proper form should be: > > > > <xref linkend="foo" /> > > Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through. <grin/> No Karsten. This came in with XML 1.0. An SGML empty element is <xref></xref> It was one of the 'short cuts'? -- Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
