Re: version control on website

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:39, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> > Option 3. Other ideas?
> 
> I don't see why we can't have both... Two links, "Index by Core
> release," then organized alphabetically within each release number, and
> "Index by Subject," organized by release number within each tutorial. Am
> I missing something?
Is the information available to sort by such criteria Paul?
If so then yes. 


> 
> Also, it might not be a bad idea for the editorial folks to, on
> publication of a new tutorial, make a list of one or more questions
> answered by the tutorial. Those questions should be organized into a
> kind of FAQ, or quasi-FAQ (QFAQ?), which a reader uses to follow a link
> to the appropriate tutorial

Speaking from fairly bitter experience. 
I've been criticised for 'answering the wrong question' or
bad categorising, for 6 years now.
  Bottom line, we can't please all of the people all of the time.
People seem to come at information from n different directions.
Its really hard without something like a topic map to provide
the differing schemas that will meet the varying needs of users.
  Great idea, and a list of xrefs would answer some of the questions.
No problem using docbook to mark it up...
  The logic for it, the groupings etc, I'll leave to the group,
I gave up trying to outguess people some time ago.
  My best solution is to use a google search of a list of pages.




-- 
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook  FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux