On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:39, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Option 3. Other ideas? > > I don't see why we can't have both... Two links, "Index by Core > release," then organized alphabetically within each release number, and > "Index by Subject," organized by release number within each tutorial. Am > I missing something? Is the information available to sort by such criteria Paul? If so then yes. > > Also, it might not be a bad idea for the editorial folks to, on > publication of a new tutorial, make a list of one or more questions > answered by the tutorial. Those questions should be organized into a > kind of FAQ, or quasi-FAQ (QFAQ?), which a reader uses to follow a link > to the appropriate tutorial Speaking from fairly bitter experience. I've been criticised for 'answering the wrong question' or bad categorising, for 6 years now. Bottom line, we can't please all of the people all of the time. People seem to come at information from n different directions. Its really hard without something like a topic map to provide the differing schemas that will meet the varying needs of users. Great idea, and a list of xrefs would answer some of the questions. No problem using docbook to mark it up... The logic for it, the groupings etc, I'll leave to the group, I gave up trying to outguess people some time ago. My best solution is to use a google search of a list of pages. -- Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
