On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:46, Dave Pawson wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 14:04, tuxxer wrote: > > Hey guys. > > > > I'm posting a draft version of what I've got so far of the hardening doc > > in my own web-space. It's not much, but it will be updated rather > > randomly, as I get chances to work on it. There isn't a "draft" > > statement on it at the moment (other than the title), but I'm working on > > that, and it will be there shortly. > > > > > > Link: http://members.cox.net/tuxxer/ > > Hi Charlie > http://members.cox.net/tuxxer/s1-chapter1-services.html > > 1. General. I was surprised to find that 'hardening' meant setting up > the ssystem to repel 'attacks'. What else would it be? > Be nice to see something like a comparison with a Windows (Norton > setup) and this, perhaps to get a perspective for a windows user? > How would this compare? Maybe something for a Windows to linux migrator, but because of the inherent differences of the OS's, the processes won't be the same. What do you mean by a "Norton" setup? > 2. On the above url, > No idea what half those services do. How about a one line description > of each? Done. > 1.4.2 you use the term 'service control'. No idea what it is. > Who is the audience for this document? If newbies included, please > tell us! Working on that part. > > Overall. > I'm a 'new to fc2' user, and its looking potentially very useful. > > Please finish it :-) > -- -- tuxxer <tuxxer(a)cox(dot)net> <== tuxxer's gpg key fingerprint ==> 57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340 EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
