On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 10:35, Dave Pawson wrote: > On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 18:23, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > > > FWIW, in SGML I have never had a problem with an unclosed <xref>. I've > > always written it as just plain <xref linkend="target"> without a > > </xref>. Of course, this is not legal in XML, so you have to include > > it. > > You are probably using the old SGML processing chain then Karsten? > Surely we don't want SGML docs around? $DAYJOB still uses SGML, whenever I refer to "my" or "our" SGML experience, it's from that. FWIW, this is part of the reason why companies like Red Hat Enterprise Linux over Fedora or any other fast moving project. By the time we reached the go/no-go decision on using XML for the next release of RHEL, the toolchain wasn't mature enough. Regardless of what happens after that decision moment, we're stuck with what we have until we put the fancy wrappings on the next release. Another reason I hang out here, it keeps me from going crazy stuck in SGML-land. :) > James Clark's sx will convert, but having done a few megs of SGML to XML > for xfree-86, I can say its a PITA. Ouch. Ouch. I'm sorry to hear you say that. I was hoping that it was going to be as easy as changing the DOCTYPE header. We try to be XML compliant with our SGML ... we'll see how it goes in the future. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer a lemon is just a melon in disguise http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
