On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 03:56, Karsten Wade wrote: (In re-response, since earlier I mentioned the editor list, and now I've re-read the post :P) > * Should there be an editorial board? Such a board would oversee the > Fedora docs, make sure we are adhering to our standards, filling in > holes, following or advancing our process, etc. Probably a good idea > * Separate mailing list for editors? Or just accept that > fedora-docs-list gets busier with traffic between editors and authors. No, one list. Mailing list, Bugzilla, and that's enough traffic - let's not have another list > * Also, much of the editing traffic can be in bugzilla, as each document > will have it's own bug throughout it's lifecycle. Yup, this is the way. Might I also discourage hosting documents on external sites? Using Bugzilla's "attach file" will work > * The board needs to have an odd number of people so that if consensus > can't be reached, a majority vote without a tie is possible. Good idea :P Or we can just set Tammy or you as the tie-breaker... > * Editorial board could just form like Voltron right now from available > interested parties (myself included there, please), and proceed with > some process defining. So there's you, there's Paul, Dave probably yes, Tammy is most likely a definite, I wouldn't mind, who else? Speak up folk :P -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
