On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 10:07, Colin Charles wrote: > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 18:09, Dave Pawson wrote: > > > > * Also, much of the editing traffic can be in bugzilla, as each document > > > will have it's own bug throughout it's lifecycle. > > > > It took me nearly ten minutes to enter a 'bug'. > > I'm reluctant to use that Karsten? > > A DMS surely isn't needed as yet? > > You'll eventually get the hang of it; I think Bugzilla is important for > tracking. For tracking bugs, yes. We aren't talking bugs? > This also means that hosting things offline is unnecessary, > and everything will be at bugzilla.redhat.com But without an updated home page (no can do) we've no reference to these stupid numbers? At least a wiki would be accessible? OK, we'll get used to using bugzilla. I don't see it as an appropriate tool for what we need to do. -- Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
