On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 09:24, Dave Pawson wrote: > I think the *use emacs* mandate is too strong, but your point > about needing Unicode is well taken. > Any text editor that supports Unicode, or an understanding of > Numerical code points is necessary. Hi, There are several free XML editors that can be used to edit DocBook documents. Being a vi user that does not need/want to learn emacs, I prefer a good Java based XML editor to do my XML editing. I think that http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ should be changed, giving potential contributors some alternatives besides recommending Emacs with PSGML mode. My 0.02, Rodolfo -- Rodolfo M. Raya <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Heartsome Holdings Pte. Ltd.
