Hi > I would argue that you can't slap an FDL on it (and > why bother anyway?), > because that puts specific restrictions on its use. > However, there is no > reason it can't be distributed along with the other > FDP materials, > without the FDL license and instead bearing a simple > statement that it > is public domain material. afaik i know you can relicense PD stuff as FDL'ed just like revised BSD licenses can be relicensed as GPL. PD may not even hold as a valid distribution license http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html you might want to use a liberal license like MIT instead of public domain. I also suggest to the fedora doc team to consider including creative commons attribution share alike license and a new fedora legal mailing list seems to be required regards Rahul Sundaram ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony/
