Mike MacCana became daring and sent these 1.0K bytes, > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Aaron Matteson wrote: > > > What i am posting about it a request for feedback on what i have done so > > far, i would hate to complete it and realize that i did it wrong. > > Pointers would also be gratefully accepted. > > Good stuff, its nice and simple. Some feedback: > > * A thought: maybe replace 'man' with 'info'. Info documentation is often > better maintained than man pages, and if you type 'info' and there's no > info page, it'll fall back to using the man page - so users get the best > available. Good idea, will do. > * I'd mention /usr/share/doc/<packagename>-<version>/ as part of > your 'Developer Documentation' section. Also a good idea, will get this section in there in a few days when i have a day off. > * 'Developer Documentation' could be taken two ways. Documentation from > Developers (which I think you mean) and Documentation *for* Developers. > I'd suggest retitling this section to 'Package Documentation' or just > 'Documentation'. I see, hadn't spotted that. I did indeed mean Docs from the developers. Package Documentation is and does sound a lot more precise. > Cheers, and thanks for your work. Thanks for the input and all input to come. -- 0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - GnuPG:0xD144B7FF 0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, 1 1 1 it should be hard to understand! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://cryptosystem.us/ - Project http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog http://mindstorm.ath.cx:8080/ - Wiki
