Re: project website link problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:48, Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 05:10, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
> > 
> > says
> > Some other interesting Bugzilla queries:
> >     * 
> > <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&component=fedora-docs&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_severity=high&bug_severity=low&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=security&bug_severity=translation&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&devel_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&keywords_type=allwords&cust_facing=YES&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=exact&bugidtype=include&chfieldto=Now&cmdtype=doit&remaction=run&namedcmd=blank&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop>All 
> > open bugs for fedora-docs
> >     * 
> > <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&component=fedora-docs&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=enhancement&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&devel_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&keywords_type=allwords&cust_facing=YES&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=exact&bugidtype=include&chfieldto=Now&cmdtype=doit&remaction=run&namedcmd=blank&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop>The 
> > requests for enhancements (RFEs) for fedora-docs
> > 
> > I was going to use that for a request to add my word, link,
> > on the jargon-buster (now I've got it out of cvs - tks Karsten).
> > But it appears (to me) to be a link to the bug reporting page?
> > 
> > Is that as it should be?
> > Even at that page, fedora docs doesn't appear as a valid project.
> > (Am I repeating what's been already said on this list?
> > It sounds familiar)
> > 
> > regards DaveP
> 
> Well, it is supposed to be a real component. ;-) I'll submit another
> request to add it as a component. Once it actually exists, it is
> probably the best way to submit additions for the Fedora Jargon doc so
> we can keep track of them.
> 
> Tammy

OK. fedora-docs actually exists now under the Fedora Core product.

Please use it to fill bugs or RFEs against existing Fedora docs so we
can keep track of them. As they come in, I'll cc the actual maintainer.

Tammy




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux