-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 November 2003 23:21, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I don't see a need to standardize just for the sake of it; if this is > something that authors are expected to do for themselves, that's ducky > by me. I just don't want to step on any toes since I'm new to this part. I think is a nice idea. Not just for the sake of it, but because I think it will be useful. Writers will end up doing similar things, using similar entities, so I think establishing a standard to all docs would be a Good Thing, since it would spare the writers the time to do it again and again to every doc. My 2 cents, though. - -- Luiz Rocha <lsdr@xxxxxxxx> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/xfRkN2+4JlrxCYYRAkgaAKCWYB1oBA4JtT7MO0NWfhxtYbg3jACfZ4sa fLyU9M70dUAZyixtkqN5yQ4= =U5SC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
