RE: Anaconda documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed:

Thanks for your $0.02 and I think you are right to think longterm if the
project should succeed.

Here is a problem I have and I know I will get ripped apart for that:

I mostly have time in between projects at work (while the network is doing
maintenance or the server is being backed up...). Unfortunately, I have not
been able to convince management to implement Linux in our workstations (we
have one server running linux). So when I get a window of opportunity to
participate I am sitting on M$ windowz machine. Are/is the tools/software
available for M$ XP?

In order for me to participate the submission process needs to be hassle
free and hopefully available for a M$ environment.


Thanks

AR


-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-docs-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-docs-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edward C. Bailey
Sent: 21 November 2003 14:15
To: fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Anaconda documents

>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Rau (work) <arau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Alexander> That's great thanks.  But the anaconda docs volunteer group
Alexander> needs to agree on a way of doing it:

Alexander> 1. Are we going to use the documentation project way or 2. are
Alexander> we using Akbar's sourceforge page?

Alexander> Any thoughts?

Well, since you asked, here's my $0.02... ;-)

My feeling is that if you want to get started *right now*, you could go
with Akbar's solution.  Long-term, though, you'd probably want to move to
the project's CVS server, as this would simplify integrating your
documentation with the distribution proper...

                                Ed
-- 
Ed Bailey        Red Hat, Inc.          http://www.redhat.com/


--

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux