Ed: Thanks for your $0.02 and I think you are right to think longterm if the project should succeed. Here is a problem I have and I know I will get ripped apart for that: I mostly have time in between projects at work (while the network is doing maintenance or the server is being backed up...). Unfortunately, I have not been able to convince management to implement Linux in our workstations (we have one server running linux). So when I get a window of opportunity to participate I am sitting on M$ windowz machine. Are/is the tools/software available for M$ XP? In order for me to participate the submission process needs to be hassle free and hopefully available for a M$ environment. Thanks AR -----Original Message----- From: fedora-docs-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-docs-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edward C. Bailey Sent: 21 November 2003 14:15 To: fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Anaconda documents >>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Rau (work) <arau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Alexander> That's great thanks. But the anaconda docs volunteer group Alexander> needs to agree on a way of doing it: Alexander> 1. Are we going to use the documentation project way or 2. are Alexander> we using Akbar's sourceforge page? Alexander> Any thoughts? Well, since you asked, here's my $0.02... ;-) My feeling is that if you want to get started *right now*, you could go with Akbar's solution. Long-term, though, you'd probably want to move to the project's CVS server, as this would simplify integrating your documentation with the distribution proper... Ed -- Ed Bailey Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com/ -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
