Any thoughts?
Harry
Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJT-144
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@xxxxxxx
-----Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
Common ARTS Software Development
AJT-144
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@xxxxxxx
To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/11/2011 03:09PM
cc: Harry Devine/ACT/FAA@FAA, Ted Rush/ACT/FAA@FAA
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication
On 01/11/2011 12:53 PM, harry.devine@xxxxxxx wrote:Should not be a problem.OK, so we are testing 389-ds in our environment (version 1.2.7.5). We have 1 machine set up with user accounts, and we just set another one up. The new one doesn't have any accounts or anything on it yet. We would like to get replication going between the 2 DS's, but can't find any current documention on how to do it. When we set up the 2nd machine, we set it up as if it were its own DS (i.e. not tied into the existing one). Not sure it that is relevant, but I thought I'd mention it for full disclosure.
We'd like to have this be a 2-way multi-master replication, so if our main DS server ever went down, the 2nd one could pick up and service login requests. Is there any current documention that explains this anywhere?
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Managing_Replication
Yes.Is multi-master the correct method to use for this type of setup?
Thanks,
Harry
Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJT-144
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@xxxxxxx
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users