Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
From: "Edward Z. Yang" <ezyang@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:59 -0400
Cc: 389-users <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CBC614B.1090509@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1287244264-sup-1714@ezyang> <1287412496-sup-6113@ezyang> <4CBC614B.1090509@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Sup/git

Done. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643979

Cheers,
Edward

P.S. Boy, I'm submitting a lot of bug reports these days! Sorry
'bout that :-)
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
  - From: Rich Megginson

References:
- [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
  - From: Edward Z. Yang
- Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
  - From: Edward Z. Yang
- Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
  - From: Rich Megginson

Prev by Date: Re: [389-users] Replication from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6 failed
Next by Date: Re: [389-users] Strange wedging
Previous by thread: Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
Next by thread: Re: [389-users] The case of a rather odd byte sequence (nsslapd-referral)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Directory Users] [Fedora Directory Devel] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Share Photos] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]