Edward Z. Yang wrote: > We also have some old servers lying around, and we've seen some > interesting differences doing replication between them and the new > servers (I didn't report them initially because I assume a heterogenous > LDAP master deployment is not... really supported.) But this information > might be helpful for debugging. > > New version is: 1.2.6 B2010.238.2133, old version is: 1.2.5 B2010.012.2024 > > * Incremental replication from new to old fails, with > > [23/Sep/2010:18:42:57 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=GSSAPI Replication to real-mccoy.mit.edu" (real-mccoy:389): Unable to parse the response to the startReplication extended operation. Replication is aborting. > Does this happen in conjunction with the sasl_io error? If not, how often does it happen? Is it easily reproducible? Does it appear to be the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547503 ? Are you using a firewall (hardware or software)? > * Incremental replication from old to new, old to old and new to new succeeds > > * Total update from old to new and old to old succeeds > > * Total update from new to new fails with the aforementioned bug > > * Total update from new to old is untested > > If you would like us to rebuild fedora-389-ds with the corresponding source > patched to read properly, we can do that. > > Edward > > Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Sun Sep 26 15:13:13 -0400 2010: > >> Hello all, >> >> We're running into this error message on a full update between two >> dirsrvs of version: >> >> 389 Project >> 389-Directory/1.2.6 B2010.238.2133 >> >> The error message is: >> >> [26/Sep/2010:15:03:35 -0400] - sasl_io_start_packet: failed - read only 3 >> bytes of sasl packet length on connection 4 >> >> According to the source code: >> >> /* >> * NOTE: A better way to do this would be to read the bytes and add them to >> * sp->encrypted_buffer - if offset < 4, tell caller we didn't read enough >> * bytes yet - if offset >= 4, decode the length and proceed. However, it >> * is highly unlikely that a request to read 4 bytes will return < 4 bytes, >> * perhaps only in error conditions, in which case the ret < 0 case above >> * will run >> */ >> >> Uh. Maybe our network is strange, maybe we've run into a different error >> condition, but this seems quite poor... >> >> Cheers, >> Edward >> > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
