Re: [389-users] Problems upgrading to 1.2.6

[Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/16/2010 11:29 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:

Oh, may I also request that the wiki page be updated to note that
the restoration process will delete the .bak file you create, so if
you /actually/ want to make a backup, you should move it somewhere
else (say, ~).

Thanks for pointing it out.  You are right.  Updated the step 3...

3. Go to the DB instance directories and rename entryrdn.db4 as follows (repeat it on all the db instances):

# cd /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/NetscapeRoot/
# mv entryrdn.db4 /safe/backup/dir/entryrdn.db4.bak
# cd /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/usrRoot/
# mv entryrdn.db4 /safe/backup/dir/entryrdn.db4.bak
  ...

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Thu Sep 16 14:14:48 -0400 2010:

Excerpts from Rich Megginson's message of Thu Sep 16 14:09:09 -0400 2010:

389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.1.a1 was the very first alpha version (i.e. 
unstable, not recommended for production use) that somehow got released 
to the F13 stable repository.  We didn't think that early alpha users 
would mind upgrading, or that early alpha users would deploy it into 
production.  I apologize for any pain/confusion caused by that.

Ah, no worries, I was just a little surprised because Fedora 13 seemed
to have been shipping that version by default.  I didn't even realize
I was using an alpha. :-)

Cheers,
Edward

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users