Re: [389-users] ns-slapd processes not dying

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

You can try to change the following parameters to reduce the timeouts of the connections :
* system parameters (reduce keepalive time to 700 seconds):
                               echo "net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 700"                >> /etc/sysctl.conf
                               sysctl -p
* 389 parameters in cn=config (change the maximum time limit per search operation to 120 sec & set idle connection timeout to 600 sec):
                               nsslapd-timelimit: 120
                               nsslapd-idletimeout: 600
 
The file descriptor number  used by a connecton can be seen in access log (fd=139) :
[28/Aug/2010:14:35:08 +0200] conn=58377 fd=139 slot=139 SSL connection from x.x.x.x to x.x.x.x
                            
You may also use /logconv.pl utility to see the long requests, number of parallel/oncurrent connections and file descriptor usage ('Highest FD taken')
Total Connections:            2855
Peak Concurrent Connections:  4
Total Operations:             157116
Total Results:                157139
Overall Performance:          100.0%
...
FDs Taken:                    3112
FDs Returned:                 3112
Highest FD Taken:             143
...
----- Top 20 Most Frequent etimes -----

156965          etime=0    
58              etime=1    
58              etime=3    
58              etime=2 


@+

2010/8/27 Angel Bosch Mora <angbosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
hi,

i had problems with "too many fds open" on some instances and after digging a bit i've found that ns-slapd dont die.

i got 5 similar installations and this is happening just in two of them and i can't identify what is about.


i've been recollecting process informations and i know for sure that the only process that keep increasing is ns-slapd and eventually, after some weeks, 389 starts refusing new connections and i got the "too many fds open" message.

i can increase max fds but the problem of processes keeping alive is still there.

anyone facing similar situation?

regards,

abosch
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux