Andrey Ivanov wrote: > > > 2010/8/25 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > Noriko Hosoi wrote: > > Thank you so much for the update, Andrey. You eliminated one of our > > concerns! (Of course, there are plenty more. ;) > > --noriko > +1 > Are there any other issues with 1.2.6.rc7? If not, I would like > to tag > this as the final 1.2.6 and push it to stable. > > It's up on our test server for a week and it's in production (three > multimasters) for a day now. I have tested it for the major problems > i've seen in the past and it seems to be ok. > > The only other semi-cosmetic issue i've found is the statistics of the > new dn cache (dnentrycachehits, dnentrycachetries and > dnentrycachehitratio in "cn=monitor,cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm > database,cn=plugins,cn=config"). The monitor values for this cache do > not change at all (this is especially strange for the hits and tries > under heavy load) : > dnentrycachehits: 19048 > dnentrycachetries: 28571 > dnentrycachehitratio: 66 > dncurrententrycachesize: 1774672 > dnmaxentrycachesize: 10485760 > dncurrententrycachecount: 9524 > dnmaxentrycachecount: -1 > > These values do not change at all on high load production servers for > at least 12 hours, from the very beginning... > > As for me, this problem is not a showstopper for labelling this > version as stable, it can be taken care of in future versions. Thanks. Please file a bug for the cache monitor issue. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
