Re: [389-users] Automatic master/consumer initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
> Hi
> Is there any difference between right clicking on a replication agreement just created and selecting the Initialize Consumer or letting "nature" go its course and letting replication happen in the next "cycle".
>
> Up until now I have created replication agreements using the GUI, but I have now started doing it via ldif files. If I don't immediately run:
> dn: cn=%repl-agreement-name%,cn=replica,cn=dc\3dCompany,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> replace: nsds5beginreplicarefresh
> nsds5beginreplicarefresh: start
>
> It seems to start on its own anyway. Having checked the data nothing looks wrong so I thought I would just double check.
>   
Doing nsds5beginreplicarefresh: start does a replica init.  A consumer 
must be initialized before a supplier can begin updating it.  If you 
have already initialized a consumer from another supplier/master, you 
don't need to initialize it again.
> Regards
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from 
> MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>   

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux