Regards.
2010/6/25 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:Hmm - ok - if you want it to replicate, then make the change using
> And how will replication behave? Will this change be propagated to the
> rest of the servers, or will it be overriden with the definition that
> thare is now in the rest of the servers?
ldapmodify while the server is running. Just replace the current
definition with your new one.
>Yes, but if you want it to work with replication, use ldapmodify instead.
> Can I change directly the 99user.ldif without restarting the server
> and then reload the schema using teh script for that?
> <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>
> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > Hi again
> >
> > What will happen if I modify the schema, creating a new aattribute
> > without specifying any matching rule? Will the directory use the
> > default rules for for the attribute syntax?
> Yes.
> >
> > Anuyway, how can I change now the matching rules for the existing
> > attributes that gives that warning? In the console, when i edit the
> > attribute in the schema, i don't see any option to change the
> matching
> > rule.
> Please file a bug about the matching rules and the console. For now,
> the only way to do it is to shutdown the server, edit 99user.ldif,
> then
> start up the server.
> >
> > Regards and thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > 2010/6/23 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have upgraded our test server(from version 1.2.5,
> > > 389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.7.rc2.el5.i386 and
> > > 389-admin-1.1.11-0.5.rc1.el5.i386), and when running
> > > "setup-ds-admin.pl <http://setup-ds-admin.pl>
> <http://setup-ds-admin.pl>
> > <http://setup-ds-admin.pl> -u", i get many messages
> > > like this (all about custom attributes):
> > >
> > > [22/Jun/2010:10:24:58 +0200] attr_syntax_create - Error: the
> > EQUALITY
> > > matching rule [caseIgnoreIA5Match] is not compatible with
> the syntax
> > > [1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15] for the attribute [XXXXXXXX]
> > >
> > > Attribute is defined as this:
> > >
> > > ( 1.3.6.1.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX NAME 'XXXX' DESC 'XXXXXXX' EQUALITY
> > > caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{1024}
> > X-ORIGIN
> > > 'user defined' )
> > Where does this attribute come from? It's kind of strange
> that the
> > syntax is DirectoryString which is essentially any valid
> UTF-8 string,
> > but the matching rule is caseIgnoreIA5Match which is for
> comparison of
> > 7-bit ASCII strings. Why not caseIgnoreMatch?
> >
> > At any rate, the message is really just a warning. There's
> really no
> > way to figure out all possible combinations of syntaxes and
> matching
> > rules that may be in use. It was my hope that this message
> would
> > cause
> > these issues to be reported to the 389 team so that we could
> > address them.
> > >
> > > Although the messages, the script finishes fine:
> > >
> > > Registering the directory server instances with the
> configuration
> > > directory server . . .
> > > Beginning Admin Server reconfiguration . . .
> > > Registering admin server with the configuration directory
> server
> > . . .
> > > Updating adm.conf with information from configuration
> directory
> > server
> > > . . .
> > > Exiting . . .
> > > Log file is '/tmp/setupbXoREC.log'
> > >
> > > But then I try access to the console, and click on "Directory
> > Server",
> > > i get this error:
> > >
> > > "Failed to install a local copy of 389-ds-1.2.3.jar or one
> of its
> > > supporting files. Please ensure that the appropriate
> console package
> > > is installed on the Administration Server.
> 389-ds-1.2.3.jar not
> > found
> > > at https://XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:2000/".
> > >
> > > Is the error about the attribute critical? Why is the
> client console
> > > requesting 1.2.3 version of the jars?
> > Because 389-ds-base now handles DN escaped values within
> other DNs
> > correctly, and requires 389-ds-1.2.3 (389-ds-console-1.2.3)
> which also
> > has support for DN escaped values in within DNs.
> 389-ds-console-1.2.3
> > should be available from the testing repos.
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2010/6/16 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> > > <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>>>>
> > >
> > > The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability
> of Release
> > > Candidate 1 of version 1.2.6. This release a couple
> of bug
> > fixes.
> > >
> > > ***We need your help! Please help us test this
> software.***
> > It is a
> > > release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but
> it has
> > been
> > > tested
> > > for regressions and for new feature bugs. The Fedora
> system
> > > strongly encourages packages to be in Testing until
> verified and
> > > pushed
> > > to Stable. If we don't get any feedback while the
> packages
> > are in
> > > Testing, the packages will remain in limbo, or get
> pushed to
> > Stable.
> > >
> > > The more testing we get, the faster we can release these
> > packages to
> > > Stable. See the Release Notes for information about
> how to
> > provide
> > > testing feedback (or just send an email to
> > > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > > <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>).
> > >
> > > The packages that need testing are:
> > > * 389-ds-base-1.2.6.rc1 - 389-ds-base
> > > * 389-admin-1.1.11.rc1 - 389-admin
> > >
> > > There are some new console/java packages too, and
> there is a new
> > > version
> > > of the 389-ds "meta" package - 1.2.1
> > >
> > > * Release Notes - http://port389.org/wiki/Release_Notes
> > > * Install_Guide - http://port389.org/wiki/Install_Guide
> > > * Download - http://port389.org/wiki/Download
> > >
> > > === Bugs Fixed ===
> > > This release contains a couple of bug fixes. The complete
> > list of
> > > bugs
> > > fixed is found at the link below. Note that bugs
> marked as
> > MODIFIED
> > > have been fixed but are still in testing.
> > > * Tracking bug for 1.2.6 release -
> > >
> >
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0>
> >
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0>>
> > >
> >
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0>
> >
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=543590&hide_resolved=0>>>
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > --
> > > 389 users mailing list
> > > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
