Re: [389-users] Windows Replication Agreement Help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 07:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 04:15 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 15:40 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We are setting up a new Windows 2K3 AD server and attempting to
> > >>>> syncronise the users from our LDAP server version 8.1.0.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Performing the full sync fails after about 30 seconds with a
> > >>>> message in the error log:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [14/Jul/2010:07:46:10 -0400] - add value "^V" to attribute type
> > >>>> "ARecord" in entry
> > >>>> "DC=@,DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,CN=System,DC=domain,DC=com"
> > >>>> failed: duplicate new value
> > >>>> [14/Jul/2010:07:46:10 -0400] - add value "null or non-ASCII" to
> > >>>> attribute type "dnsproperty" in entry
> > >>>> "DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,CN=System,DC=domain,DC=com"
> > >>>> failed: duplicate new value
> > >>>>
> > >>>> and none of the users or groups are sent to AD. I am guessing
> > >>>> it may be how our LDAP server schema is setup as we use
> > >>>> something like:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> dc=domain,dc=com
> > >>>> |_ o=Internal
> > >>>> |___o=a0000
> > >>>> |____ou=Desktops
> > >>>> |_____uid=fred
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We have set the Windows subtree to be dc=domain,dc=com and the
> > >>>> replication subtree to be dc=domain,dc=com with a DS subtree of
> > >>>> o=Internal,dc=domain,dc=com.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Our understanding was that within AD Users & Groups GUI we
> > >>>> should have seen a similar schema created.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Though for some reason the replication is traversing the whole
> > >>>> of the internal AD tree.
> > >>>>
> > >>> Because you set the AD subtree to be dc=domain,dc=com ?
> > >>>
> > >>>> Should we create a new Organisational Unit within AD called,
> > >>>> for arguments sake, clients and set the Windows subtree to be
> > >>>> ou=clients,dc=domain,dc=com so that it forces it to that branch
> > >>>> ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> I think that's the way it was designed. Usually AD trees have a
> > >>> CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com where all of the user entries live,
> > >>> and
> > >>> winsync is designed to work with that sort of structure.
> > >>>
> > >> <snip>
> > >> Hmm . . . we've rooted AD in dc=myad,dc=domain,dc=com and
> > >> synchronized
> > >> at cn=users,dc=myad,dc=domain,dc=com but still have the exact
> > >> same
> > >> problem :(
> > >>
> > > <snip>
> > > I also tried creating an ou in AD, e.g.,
> > > ou=LDAPUSers,dc=myad,dc=domain,dc=com in case it did not like
> > > building
> > > Organizations under CNs but that also failed - John
> > >
> > Not sure what you mean by "building Organizations" - but it
> > shouldn't
> > matter if it is under a CN or not.
> <snip>
> We're running 8.1. Based upon some of the change logs I've seen for
> some of the more recent versions of 389, I wonder if this is just a
> problem between 8.1 and Windows Server 2008. We are downgrading a
> Domain Controller to 2003 to see if the problem goes away - John
> 

The problem still exists on W2K3/32bit and we see the following error:

windows_tot_run: failed to obtain data to send to the consumer; LDAP error - 1

The user we are bind with in AD is a member of Domain Admins; do we need to add some other group or security membership ?
-- 
Thanks, Phil
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux