Barry Sitompul wrote: > Hi All, > > > Thanks for the replies! > > I am running the DS on a RHEL 5.5 x86_64 VM. > > It's got 8GB of RAM and out of that I allocated 600MB for the LDBM > plugin cache. I have four backend databases so does it mean 600 x 4 = > 2.4GB in total? Plus 3.8GB in total for the database entry caches. > > after a closer look, the virtual memory usage spikes everytime an > unindexed search is performed. Now I've got one sitting at 10G virtual > memory usage. I would think that the usage should be limited to the > maximum cache size above. > Not necessarily, if it is memory that is not used by either the entry cache or the db caches. Can you reproduce this behavior on bare metal (i.e. not a vm)? > I started with the clean install of the VM and the 389-DS 1.2.5 so I > don't think there is a problem with the OS, but thanks for the offer > Gerrard. > > What can cause the memory usage to always go up and not limited to the > max cache size? > > > Cheers! > Bazza > On 13/07/2010, at 7:06 PM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: > > >> Hi Barry, >> I am running the DS on VirtualBox with only 512Mb ram and 2500 >> users. I am using vanilla install from EPEL and Centos 5.5 fully >> updated. Unless you have memory problems I can't see why the same >> would not work for you. Granted I use a very clean install. I can >> send you the package removal listings in the kickstart if you are >> interested. Other than that, providing more information about your >> versions as stated in another reply will be the best course of action. >> >> Regards >> ________________________________________ >> From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> ] on behalf of Barry Sitompul [b.sitompul@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 13 July 2010 00:26 >> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. >> Subject: [389-users] 389 DS 1.2.5 on RHEL VM >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> Has anyone had the experience of running the DS on a VM? >> >> I've got one set up running on a RHEL VM and it looks like the virtual >> memory usage keeps going up and stays up with every LDAP query (I just >> use top). >> >> I'm not sure if this is caused by the application problem or this is >> expected RHEL behaviour? >> >> Any help is much appreciated! >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Bazza >> >> >> >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan >> from >> MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
